A code review has turned up ideas worth exploring. The next question is which ones would actually improve the project.
The Genie sends Codex a focused research job and brings back ranked recommendations, from safer registrations to cancellation tests. The result is a set of concrete proposals to consider, not a pile of changes silently applied to the codebase.
Read transcript
Excellent. Thanks for the update. So based on your analysis of both the DeepSeek harness and Nautilo, could you go ahead and give me a narrow, sort of bounded set of improvements that we could take from the DeepSeek abstraction and bring into Nautilo? Fire off another Codex probe and let's see what it comes back with. I've fired off a tightly bounded Codex probe. It will return no more than five ranked improvements with exact file mappings, minimal implementation slices, tests, rollback plans, security constraints, and a 30-60-90-day sequence with kill gates. The best three ideas are: One. Owner-bound registrations. Prevent stale MCP catalog cleanup from deleting newer registrations. Small, low-risk, and immediately useful. Cancellation race tests port DeepSeek's deterministic race matrix into Nautilo's ACP tests. Change production code only when a test exposes a real defect. Model request reconstruction. In observe-only mode, verify that live and resumed requests produce the same sanitized digest, catching replay drift without storing prompts or secrets. Later, consider immutable tool lifecycle envelopes and pre-effect durability, but only for genuinely idempotent operations. Keep Nautilo's authorization, encryption, persistence, relay, and deployment architecture. Do not adopt Cordis or "everything" as a plug-in.